Director’s update


Best Bets – reflections on West Africa and emerging lessons

20 March 2010



Ian Maudlin writes


We have just completed screening the proposals submitted for the West African round of our Best Bets programme – all 85 of them. The Best Bets initiative aims to put existing agricultural research findings into use at scale through partnerships in which the private sector plays a significant role. Ideally I want RIU to provide a one-off grant which will clear a ‘logjam’ to enabling a sustainable enterprise to be created or an existing one strengthened.

Following the East, Central and Southern Africa round we ended up supporting five Best Bets. All have now passed through due diligence and contracting and are making good progress with their respective logjams – updates on each of them appear elsewhere on the website.

The Best Bet exemplar which is based on new approaches to controlling sleeping sickness in Uganda is also going from strength to strength. The team from the University of Edinburgh, which is one of the key partners in this initiative, has just received a grant for £1 million from the UK’s Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council to adapt and extend the approaches used in Uganda to the control of the animal form of sleeping sickness in Nigeria.

To be honest, I was disappointed by the quality of the Best Bets proposals submitted from West Africa. Many of the proposals were rejected because they really wanted to do more research rather than put existing research into use; others were too ‘project’ oriented – it was not at all clear what lasting legacy would exist when RIU funding ended. In the end we selected just two proposals for further consideration.

One of these builds on one of the RIU Best Bets we have already funded by taking private sector experience gained in Kenya and using this to help register the first bio-pesticides in Ghana. This is potentially very important to Ghana; the Ghanaian export horticulture sector has grown significantly over recent years but is now under intense pressure to limit pesticide usage by the EU. Registering bio-pesticides is an important first step to making these greener alternatives to chemical pesticides available in Ghana, which should help to safeguard this important trade.

The other West African Best Bet being considered further is concerned with making available disease-free planting material for yams – a very important crop for the poor in West Africa.

These two teams have been provided with detailed feedback and a list of issues they need to address. They have also been provided with a grant and a format for writing a business plan. The deadline for submission of completed business plans is 9 April and between now and then the RIU team will work closely with these projects to maximize the chances of fundable business plans being developed.

The fact that only two of 85 proposals were shortlisted from West Africa raises important questions about the Best Bets approach. Is there something fundamentally different between East, Central and Southern Africa, on the one hand, and West Africa, on the other?

One possibility is that Best Bets work best in countries with a well-developed SME (small and medium enterprises) sector – such as Kenya, which did well in the Best Bets process. Certainly, the private sector is not so well established and developed in some West African countries as it is in Kenya, although in others, such as Nigeria, it is clearly very strong and vibrant.

Perhaps the issue is that the private sector in West Africa is not used to working with the public sector? But I think another lesson is that it takes time to build up the network of partners needed to mount a successful Best Bets bid. Of the five funded in the first round, four were well established teams of researchers, government officials and private sector partners who knew each other well and had built up the all important spirit of mutual trust over several years.

The exemplar Best Bet on sleeping sickness in Uganda was selected by RIU at an early stage – long before I joined the programme – as representing a cluster of research findings originating from the DFID-funded Animal Health Programme, part of the RNRRS legacy, which had high potential for impact. In fact I know – because I was personally involved in the underlying research – that this Best Bet builds on research undertaken over more than 15 years.

Perhaps more importantly, it also builds on personal friendships and professional relationships between researchers and university teachers and students in the UK and Uganda, Ugandan government officials and senior personnel from Ugandan and multinational veterinary pharmaceutical companies. Friendships established many years ago between junior colleagues in Uganda and the UK have been sustained over the years and those colleagues now occupy senior positions in universities, ministries and companies – they are now leaders and policy makers.

It turns out that economic theory supports my observation. In the on-line version of the UK Times newspaper on 12 March there was an article discussing the value of ‘social capital’, which the writer, Antonia Senior defines as ‘who you know and how you plug into the complex human webs that bind companies and transmit knowledge’. She goes on to write: “There are sound economic reasons for the importance of social capital – this is not just the old boys’ club dressed up. Oliver Williamson won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 2009 for his work on transaction costs. One element of his research found that trust reduces transaction costs – in other words, if you’re doing business with someone you know, the cost of doing it decreases.”

The challenge we now face is finding a way to kick-start the process of building strong and productive multi-sectoral and multi-national partnerships – preferably in less than a decade or more.

Perhaps this is the role that innovation platforms play – fast-tracking the ad hoc and informal process that took many years in the case of the sleeping sickness initiative into a matter of months? If this is the case then there is perhaps less difference between RIU’s African Country Programmes’ innovation platform approach and our portfolio of Best Bets than I had at first thought.

Advertisements

Director’s update


Partnership with AGRA

16 March 2010



Ian Maudlin writes

I am pleased to report that plans for collaboration with AGRA have continued and RIU and AGRA will now jointly fund the forthcoming AWEPA (The Association of European Parliamentarians with Africa) African Parliamentary Support for Agriculture mission to Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania.

In brief, the mission is part of a pilot programme to help develop and strengthen the institutional capacity of parliamentary committees overseeing agriculture and food security. As AGRA’s Vice President, Dr. Akinwumi Adesina commented, “our partnership with AWEPA is critical because any improvement that occurs in farmers’ fields cannot be sustained over the long-term without a supportive policy framework. This is the time for political leadership across Africa to develop and implement comprehensive policies of support for African farmers”.

I am looking forward to reporting on their progress

Director’s update


StopStriga

1 March 2010



Ian Maudlin writes

I was recently reminded why the RIU programme is so important. Keith Sones, who leads our excellent communication team, recently returned from a visit to western Kenya to check in with one of the projects funded under the RIU Best Bets initiative. On his return he wrote to his communications team as a reminder of why their work was important:


“Together with Nik [Wood, the RIUtv correspondent], I flew to Kisumu, on the shores of Lake Victoria, to see what one of our Best Bets is doing and to meet some of the farmers they are working with. These are poor, small-scale farmers struggling to feed their families. They have tiny plots on which they grow traditional varieties of crops – maize, sorghum, cowpeas – saving their own seed and using no fertilizer or any other purchased inputs. Their fields were full of the deceptively beautiful Striga plant – also known as witchweed. This is a parasitic weed that has few roots of its own and instead taps into germinating cereal seeds, sucking the goodness out of them as they grow and leaving the resulting plants stunted and with little or no yield. Tellingly, we visited a local homestead – mud huts, bare-footed children – and saw the traditional round granary, intricately constructed with sides made from woven sticks and a thatched roof, falling in to disrepair; there simply wasn’t enough harvest to make it worthwhile keeping it is good order. One of our Best Bets provides the promise of a simple affordable package of technology that could transform these farmers fields: soaking the seed corn overnight to hasten germination; adding a tiny amount of fertilizer to the soaking water to give the germinating seed a boost and to counter local soil deficiencies; and then next day, prior to sowing, treating the seed with a natural fungus that attacks the Striga weed. Once Striga is under control these farmers might consider trying improved, higher-yielding varieties of seed and other better practices, such as correct spacing and use of small amounts of properly targeted fertilizer: their granaries might again be repaired and full!”

Follow this link to the Best Bets Striga page to see this film.


These simple interventions could transform the food security and lives of these farmers, who live in one of the poorest parts of Kenya.

The research that is being put to productive use in the above example was completed in the 1990s, but to date has not been commercially exploited; excellent scientific papers but the technology remains on the shelf. The Real IPM company is based in Thika, Kenya. Its core business is supplying biological control agents to the highly successful, large-scale horticultural industry in Kenya and beyond. The grant awarded through the RIU Best Bets initiative has allowed Real IPM to diversity into a completely new market segment. This has meant applying their existing expertise, resources and facilities but complementing these with new partnerships with NGOs, local community leaders, agrovet kiosks and local FM radio stations to enable them to reach out to and engage with small-scale traditional farmers in western Kenya.

This Best Bets clearly shows one of the vital ingredients needed to put research into use – a highly committed champion. Henry Wainwright, the MD of the Real IPM Company, was until 10 years ago enjoying the life of an academic in the UK. Today he is at the helm of a successful, growing and highly innovative company which employs 80 Kenyans. He even sold his house in the UK to finance the establishment of his company – that’s real commitment and it made a big impression on the panellists at the Best Bets event, held in Nairobi last November.

It is early days yet, but I will be following the progress made by Real IPM and their partners, and all the other Best Bets projects, with great interest. You too can follow their story through the short RIUtv films posted on the RIU website- see, for example, the latest update on striga/Real IPM story.

And building on the success of the first round of Best Bets, which focused on East, Central and Southern Africa, we are now forging ahead with round two, focused on West Africa. By the closing date on January 29th, 85 proposals had been submitted. We are currently in the process of drawing up a shortlist and an announcement on this will be made soon. The first round of Best Bets yielded five very interesting projects which show great promise and I am really looking forward to seeing how Best Bets develops.